finsler geometry, hypercomplex numbers and physics
Ðóññêèé
HOME | ABOUT | JOURNAL | ARTICLES | POLYNUMBERS | ALL SECTIONS | DISCUSSION | LOGIN
SECTIONS
Discussion
News
Articles
Journal
Polynumbers
Archive
Books
Prizes & Competitions
Institute
Moscow, FERT-2019
Moscow, FERT-2018
Murom, FERT-2017
Murom, FERT-2016
Murom, FERT-2015
Brasov FERT-2014
Debrecen FERT-2013
Roger Penrose - 2013
Moscow, FERT-2012
Braşov FERT-2011
Moscow FERT-2010
Moscow FERT-2009
Cairo FERT-2008
Moscow FERT-2007
Cairo FERT-2006
FinslerSchool "Wood Lake"
Conferences
Seminars
Films
Presentations
Foto
Pyramides
Software
Drafts
SEARCH
Journal
Prizes & Competitions
The article is submitted to the editorial board. It is visible to everyone. Attached files are visible only to confirmed users of the site.

A question for the site's authors based on 20 years of research
dis003 | Observer

Judging by your website and the scattered information that occasionally reaches you, you've been trying to achieve something new in physics for over 20 years, relying on hypercomplex numbers.
In principle, exploratory research is a good thing, especially in our idea-poor times.
Especially since your journal contains many interesting articles exploring a wide variety of areas.

But you're particularly keen on associative-commutative algebras—polynumbers. Although they're clearly very inconvenient for geometry and physics.
Has your group managed to achieve anything significant in this area in almost a quarter of a century?!
Or are you still somewhere at the very beginning?